<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Public Financing of Elections?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://votersnotdonors.org/2009/06/what-is-public-financing-of-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://votersnotdonors.org/2009/06/what-is-public-financing-of-elections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:10:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Albanetti</title>
		<link>http://votersnotdonors.org/2009/06/what-is-public-financing-of-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Albanetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votersnotdonors.org/?p=187#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi Sherry:

Thanks for your question. There is a bit of history behind the amount of matching funds provided to candidates: 2 to 1, 4 to 1, and NYC is now at 6 to 1. From our perspective, the more public money in a campaign, the better. A higher amount of public money means less private money, which, in turn, means less influence that special interests, lobbyists, and corporations will hold over the elected official.

I hope that helps you understand the general logic behind the number. Please let us know if you have any other questions!

-Charlie

_
Charlie Albanetti
Communications
Citizen Action of New York</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sherry:</p>
<p>Thanks for your question. There is a bit of history behind the amount of matching funds provided to candidates: 2 to 1, 4 to 1, and NYC is now at 6 to 1. From our perspective, the more public money in a campaign, the better. A higher amount of public money means less private money, which, in turn, means less influence that special interests, lobbyists, and corporations will hold over the elected official.</p>
<p>I hope that helps you understand the general logic behind the number. Please let us know if you have any other questions!</p>
<p>-Charlie</p>
<p>_<br />
Charlie Albanetti<br />
Communications<br />
Citizen Action of New York</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Byrnes</title>
		<link>http://votersnotdonors.org/2009/06/what-is-public-financing-of-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Byrnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votersnotdonors.org/?p=187#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Where did the 4:1 number get created from...many conservatives mahy have an issue with that who might otherwise support such a measure...what is the rationale for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did the 4:1 number get created from&#8230;many conservatives mahy have an issue with that who might otherwise support such a measure&#8230;what is the rationale for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
